Mindreading Beyond Belief: A More Comprehensive Conception of How We Understand Others

 

 

Traditional theories of mindreading tend to focus exclusively on attributing beliefs and desires to other agents. The literature emphasizes belief attribution in particular, with numerous debates over when children develop the concept of belief, how neurotypical adult humans attribute beliefs to others, whether non-human animals have the concept of belief, etc. I describe a growing school of thought that the heavy focus on belief leaves traditional theories of mindreading unable to account for the complexity, diversity, and messiness of ordinary social interactions. I present a few broader, more comprehensive conceptions of mindreading that take into account how stereotypes, character trait inferences, social biases, and more influence how we understand and interact with others. These broader conceptions of mindreading promise to be more empirically adequate and have fruitful application to various debates in philosophy and cognitive science.

 

Read full paper here.

 

Please reload

Featured Posts

How Well Do We Know Others' Minds?

October 16, 2019

1/10
Please reload

Recent Posts

October 16, 2019

March 3, 2016

Please reload

Follow Us
Search By Tags
Please reload

Archive
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square

www.philosophy.okstate.edu

Department of Philosophy

Oklahoma State University

© 2015 by Shannon Spaulding